🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Collectively, these progressive attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. There should be universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be protected. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you likely cannot establish limits at democracy," observed a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to try to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this effort. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for holding placards against genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and died to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how easily we allowed them to be eroded.