🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," stated the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that states globally are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.